Gold Look

Wet light - light wet season, look and Crimson Gold is going to look like much. Klrbar the make-up artist tells Saba that looks how you follow this season of festivals.
Face: the face with a clear, dark beige foundation to blend well. Find it in sync in the direction from top to bottom. Then with the help of brush on the cheeks Blush Blush Sinnabar Shimr to touch the light. Highlight Shimr bronze cheeks and T-zone.
Eyes: eyelids (Ailid) Gorjias on the Gold Blend well to put on eye shadow. Then the brow bone Shimr the bronze (the bulge portion of eyebrows) highlight. Lower lash (lower Brunion Define the Eye Define Eye Pencil Shade of the Desert Glow or drag a line. Brunion the stain and apply two coats of mascara to make long-Duo. When a coat is dry, apply a second coat.
Lips: Lip Gloss Find Tronsperent or Bud.
Crimson Look
Face: face-to-clean crush Caramel Klrbar Find the Time Plus Foundation. Well to blend. Then to look suave and Shaidoi Peachy Rose Blush on the cheeks with the help of brush strokes Blsr to light. Shimr the day after the cheeks (cheek) and t Highlight Zone.

Eyes: eyelids to coat light to shed on the Shimr Rose Pink. Well to blend. Now, i lower Brunion Define the - Desert Glow (the light line drawn) to Define. Apply mascara to the outside corners of the eyes. Mascara Duo from the Brunion to the dense and tall. Apply two coats.

Lips: Lip color bar on the lips with the help of brush cherry lip balm pot pot put lipstick shade.

Loss-making Korea GP

Korean Grand Prix organisers have warned that theKorean Grand Prix organisers have warned is under threat of closure unless Formula One boss Bernie Ecclestone gives them a cheaper contract, a report said.

Promoter Park Won-Hwa said the grand prix, held at Yeongam in rural South Jeolla, had made a "big financial loss" and was unpopular with the local community since joining the glitzy Formula One circuit last year.
Park told Autosport magazine that South Korea was keen to keep its grand prix, but he said the event's future depended on whether Ecclestone would let them negotiate a new deal.
"We are trying hard, but we need the co-operation of Mr. Bernie Ecclestone. We certainly want to continue with this event because it is a big event, even though we have losses," he said, in an interview released on Tuesday.
"We want to give this region momentum by holding this event to help boost its economy and to boost the image, and to change our farming background in this region."
Park added that it was "too early for me to say" what would happen if there was no change to the contract. When asked if the race's future depended on a better deal, he said: "Yes. That is right. But we wish to continue."
"He (Ecclestone) knows perfectly well our current situation, and I hope he is more co-operative," Park added.
South Korea became Asia's sixth Formula One host last October, seeking the boost to its prestige and tourism associated with the widely televised event. India will also debut on the circuit next week.
But Park said the event had quickly run into trouble because of the large hosting fee agreed with Formula One before he took up his post this year, with a mandate to slash costs.
Local media reports quoted by Autosport said Sunday's race cost about US$82 million, including a US$55 million fee for hosting and TV rights, against US$25 million in ticket sales. The current contract runs until 2016.
"My main focus has been on reducing the costs as much as possible," said Park. "This is the core issue. Some local people in this region are against the race because of a big financial loss in hosting the race and organising this event.
"Those citizens, who have a background as farmers and are normally poor, want to have the funds distributed for other purposes rather than be used for this so-far unpopular event."
Similar concerns have been voiced by grand prix organisers in China and Australia, while speculation has also been raised about the night race in Singapore where officials are yet to extend their initial five-year deal.

Pregnant celebs

Closer home, you can catch glimpses of Lara Dutta’s growing belly on TV channels and newspapers, while Sonika Kaliraman Mallik’s is on display on Bigg Boss 5. The only dampener in the belly show is Aishwarya Rai Bachchan, who has refused to stand in the pregnancy limelight by maintaining a low profile since her impending motherhood was confirmed some months ago.

Twenty years have passed since the custom of celebs displaying their heavily pregnant bodies became fashionable. It all began when actor Demi Moore appeared nude on the cover of Vanity Fair in 1991. Moore, then 28, was seven months pregnant when she

What no one had anticipated, however, was the passionate debate the image sparked off. Public reactions ranged from protests about the sexual objectification of women’s bodies to celebrations of the photo as a symbol of female empowerment. Before ‘ More Demi Moore’ the pregnant body incited mixed reactions in popular culture. Because of the high premium on thinness, the pregnant belly was seen as being repulsive, a sign of the deeply embedded fears and anxiety of women about body control and their reproductive system.
Pregnant women are now viewed as fashion icons, a trend that has fuelled a market in chic maternity clothes. It’s a hot fashion trend to be pregnant, one that brands are capitalising on. “ Maternity clothing is fashionable as the idea is to celebrate your new curves in style, not hide them under layers of clothing,” says Pooja Dhawan, India head of Mothercare, the UK retailer. Maternity fashion shoots and ramp shows are becoming big business now that baby- induced curves are both fashionable and sexy.
The swollen belly has become the new erogenous zone, competing with big breasts. YouTube videos, in fact, have several titillating come- hither images of the swollen pregnant belly. Certainly, celeb culture has challenged the ‘ docile’ image of the female body. It has granted permission to middle- class women to make a public display of their pregnancies and served the purpose of shaking up conflicted and repressed attitudes towards sexuality.
A woman with her big belly on display seems to be saying: Yes, I’m having sex and am proud of it too! She looks for different ways of flaunting her pregnancy. She may keep rubbing and holding her belly in public, gestures designed to attract attention. Big bellies also provide an excuse to wear tees with labels that scream a pregnant status such as: ‘ Eating for Two’; ‘ I’m pregnant, what’s your excuse?’; ‘ Pregnant, not fat’. Other ladies turn online, to Facebook, sticking pictures of their naked, often painted bellies at difference stages of pregnancy.
Whether you like what you see or not isn’t a matter of concern, for the message seems to be: If you don’t want to see my pregnant belly, don’t look. But I’m not gonna hide it either! The docility, maternal altruism and selfsacrifice associated with pregnancy have been replaced by a new aggression that manifests as a flaunting of fertility. For some, a baby bump is an expression of fruitfulness; a growing belly accompanied by glowing skin signifies good health and abundance. For others, it’s proof that their relationship with their partner has reached a ‘ secure’ stage, offering proof that family values and sexual morality still prevail despite the culture of increasing uncertainty.
But shouldn’t we be wary of this public display of what is essentially a private matter? Doesn’t it perpetuate the message that fertility should be celebrated only as long as the fertile are wealthy and glamorous? The petite bumps sported good- looking celebs are like fashion accessories, cultivated through extreme body regimens. There’s no getting away from the reality that gross female pregnancy has no place in this scenario. And that only public displays of pregnancy that interest people are those made by rich, famous and beautiful. So where does that leave you and me?

Pakistan warns Afghanistan

Pakistan warned Afghanistan against anymore regional "point scoring" on Thursday after Kabul signed a pact with Islamabad's archenemy New Delhi that some fear could prompt Pakistan to strengthen its alleged support for Afghan insurgents.

Pakistan is under increasing American pressure to cut ties with militants that it is widely believed to be holding onto for use as potential partners against Indian influence in Afghanistan once Washington withdraws its combat troops in 2014.
The strategic partnership signed by Afghan President Hamid Karzai on a visit to India on Tuesday added to concerns in Islamabad that New Delhi was increasing its influence on Pakistan's western flank. The deal came at a sensitive time for Islamabad, which is facing renewed accusations by U.S. and Afghan officials of collusion with militants in attacks on Afghan soil.
In Pakistan's first reaction to the deal, Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Tehmina Janjua said "this is no time for point scoring, playing politics or grandstanding."
"At this defining stage when challenges have multiplied, as have the opportunities, it is our expectation that everyone, specially those in position of authority in Afghanistan, will demonstrate requisite maturity and responsibility," she told reporters.
President Karzai tried to assuage concern over the agreement Wednesday, saying it was not intended as an aggressive move against Pakistan. He said the pact simply made official years of close ties between India and Afghanistan's post-Taliban government. New Delhi has given significant amounts of civilian aid to Kabul over the last 10 years to build roads, schools and hospitals.
Karzai's words likely carried little weight in Pakistan, which is sandwiched between Afghanistan to its west and India to its east. Pakistan's army has long viewed policy in Afghanistan through one lens: countering the perceived danger of Indian influence in the country.
"The agreement will heighten Pakistan's insecurities," said Talat Masood, an analyst and former Pakistani general. "Pakistan has always felt that it is being encircled by India from both the eastern and western borders."
An editorial in Pakistan's leading English-language newspaper, Dawn, expressed concern that the pact — the first of its kind between Kabul and any country — could "lead to ill-advised efforts to ramp up Pakistani involvement in Afghanistan."
Pakistan and India have fought three wars and been fierce enemies since the two were carved out of British India in 1947.
Relations between Pakistan and Afghanistan have also been rocky, with many Pakistani officials viewing Karzai as too close to India, where he attended university.
To check India's power in Afghanistan, Pakistan has historically supported Islamist militants like the Taliban who it believes are also opposed to India and its majority Hindu population. Islamabad has also allegedly backed militants who have carried out attacks in Kashmir, an area claimed by both Pakistan and India.
Pakistan maintains it severed ties with the Taliban and other militants following the U.S. invasion of Afghanistan in 2001. But Washington and Kabul say otherwise.
The U.S. has recently accused Pakistan's main spy agency, the ISI, of supporting the Haqqani militant network, which is allied with the Taliban and is suspected of carrying out a recent attack against the U.S. Embassy in Kabul. The group is believed to be based in Pakistan's North Waziristan tribal area near the Afghan border.
Afghan's interior minister has accused the ISI of being involved in last month's suicide bombing in Kabul that killed former Afghan President Burhanuddin Rabbani, who was leading the government's U.S-backed effort to talk peace with the Taliban.
Masood, the former general, also expressed concern that Afghanistan's pact with New Delhi could prompt Pakistan to step up support for militant proxies. Washington's growing ties with growing global power India have also made Islamabad suspicious, he said.
"The agreement will further reinforce their feeling that the Americans and the Indians are pursuing a policy toward Afghanistan that is hostile to Pakistan's interests," said Masood.
The Afghan-Indian strategic partnership outlines areas of common concern including trade, economic expansion, education, security and politics. One of its most sensitive provisions stipulates that India will help train and equip Afghanistan's security forces.
India is already helping train more than 100 members of the Afghan national security forces, said an official with the U.S.-led coalition in Afghanistan, who spoke on condition of anonymity because the coalition was not a signatory to the partnership agreement.
Greater Indian involvement in Afghanistan's security forces would likely spark further concern in Islamabad.
Despite Afghanistan's efforts to strengthen ties with India, analysts and former officials said there were limits to the country's ability to sideline Pakistan, even if it wanted to. One of the most important is geography.
"The imperative of geography is that landlocked Afghanistan will continue to have to look to Pakistan for trade access and related issues for the future," said Maleeha Lodhi, a former Pakistani diplomat.
The Afghan government will also need Pakistan to use its militant links to push forward peace talks with the Taliban, even if Islamabad hasn't done much to help so far, said Hasan-Askari Rizvi, a Pakistani political and defense analyst.
"Moving closer to India is the only strategy available to counter Pakistani pressure," said Rizvi. "But in the long run, Afghanistan can't alienate Pakistan altogether."
Lodhi, the former diplomat, said she hopes Pakistan keeps this bigger picture in mind before making hasty decisions on the security front.

Ban Indian films in Pakistan

A ban on Indian films in Pakistan's cinema houses would help the country's film industry 'develop and thrive', a Pakistani daily said Friday.

An editorial in The Nation said the demand made by a group of artists, singers and directors in Lahore Wednesday to ban Indian films in national cinema houses ought to be met by the government.
'That would help the national film industry develop and thrive.
'There are lots of cinema houses which screen only Indian movies and do not show any interest in playing Pakistani movies. The result is a gradual decline of our own film industry,' it said.
It warned that 'by not banning Bollywood films being shown in every nook and cranny of the country, we would only be letting the Indians succeed in their ploy of invading us culturally'.
The editorial, however, did not go into the details of what it described as cultural invasion.
It claimed that according to the group of Pakistan movie directors, 'certain self-seeking individuals associated with Lollywood are reaping huge benefits by making huge investments in India'.
The editorial added that the government should not only ban Indian films from Pakistan's cinema houses, 'but also from the various private TV channels that keep broadcasting them'.
'The policy of letting India disseminate its culture freely in Pakistan is dealing a serious financial blow to the Lollywood industry and polluting the minds of the youth,' it said.

Accused Of Bank Robbery

A man acquitted of murdering a rival gang member in Boston has been indicted by a federal grand jury on charges that he robbed a San Leandro bank.

Jonathan Scott Sanders, 22, robbed a Fremont Bank of $950 on June 8 after handing over a demand note and telling a teller, "Give me big bills, b," FBI Special Agent Lesline Wimbley wrote in an affidavit filed in U.S. District Court in Oakland. At the time of the robbery, Sanders had a gold grill over his teeth and a stud earring in his left ear, authorities said.
An informant told San Leandro police a day after the holdup that the suspect's nickname was "Boston" and that he had "beat a murder rap" in Massachusetts, Wimbley wrote. Local media reports said Sanders was acquitted of gunning down a rival gang member on a bus.
Boston police positively identified Sanders from a bank surveillance photo, and he was arrested June 16 by San Leandro police. At the time of his arrest, Sanders had an earring but no gold "grill," the affidavit said. The demand note included fingerprints belonging to both Sanders and the informant, authorities said.
"I know based on training and experience that bank robbers will fabricate gold "grills" to create misidentifications," Wimbley wrote.

Civil Liberties

Prime Minister Manmohan Singh Friday urged the police forces to 'honestly discharge their duties' and function within the democratic framework to 'scrupulously respect and uphold' civil liberties.

'Our country currently witnessed an outpouring of public anger against corruption. Life in the service of the people of India is a noble calling, particularly for those charged with the responsibility of lives and security of citizens,' Manmohan Singh said at the all India conference of the directors general and inspectors general of police here.
'People who enlist themselves for such a cause must, therefore, take pride in their ability to honestly discharge their duties.'
Though he did not name the anti-graft movement of Anna Hazare, who sat on a 12-day fast at Ramlila Maidan in the capital in August demanding a strong Lokpal bill, his reference to the anti-corruption protest was more than an indication.
'Crowd control techniques in a democracy, where people often rigorously vent their opinions and sometimes their frustrations, have to strike a fine balance between the requirement to maintain law and order and the imperative of using absolutely minimum non-lethal force,' he said.
Noting that the Jammu and Kashmir Police, which had to deal with stone-pelting by protesters last summer, had improved their capabilities considerably in this regard, the prime minister said: 'We need to be keep looking at newer methods and methodologies and technologies of handling demonstrations.'
Reiterating his call made at the recent National Integration Council meeting against perceived biases, sometimes, of the law enforcement and investigation agencies against minorities, Singh said the existence of such a perception 'is inimical to effective policing', which must necessarily draw upon the confidence and cooperation of all sections of the population it served.
'I would like you to consider ways and means to deal with the causes of such perception wherever they exist,' he appealed.
Manmohan Singh said these were 'difficult and challenging times' for the country's security forces.
'Our social fabric continues to be targeted by organised terrorism, abetted by misguided zeal and false propaganda among the youth and the marginalised sections of society,' he said.
Manmohna Singh noted that the security forces had to contend with Left-wing militancy, parochial and chauvinistic movements, and tensions caused by social-economic imbalances and inequity, and also by rapid urbanisation.
'Policing the metropolitan areas, the control of organised of crime and the protection of women and the elderly require special attention,' he said.
'While dealing firmly with these challenges, our police forces must function within the bounds of a democratic framework, within which the democratic rights of our people are scrupulously respected and upheld. I am sure that if our forces are led ably and guided properly, they will find themselves more than equal to the task, daunting though they are,' he added.

Sacrificing Civil Liberties

People in America are deeply divided over whether their civil liberties should be sacrificed to fight terrorism, according to a new poll.
According a survey public accepted some government intrusions than other.
The survey showed that 71 percent supported the use of surveillance cameras in public places as it would help to watch suspicious activities, but fewer than half favored the use of a national ID card, the Daily News reports.
Fifty-eight percent were in favor of random full-body scans at airports, while 35 percent were in favor of ethnic or racial profiling to determine who gets screened, the survey revealed.
The poll also revealed that nearly half of Americans believe the government should be allowed to read emails sent outside the US without a warrant, but that drops to under a third for emails sent inside the country, the report said.
Half of the people surveyed believed that they have lost some personal freedoms since September 11 attack, and half of those said it 'wasn't necessary'.